Comparative Rhetorical Analysis

Abortion Speeches - Pro-life Senator Sam Brownback is bringly not as usual as Hillary Clinton . In Abortion and the scruples of the Nation Revisited Brownback is discussing the suit of Clinton s vocabulary , c all in alled Women s Rights Both political figures , besides , approach the motif of miscarriage with a severe taper on varied rhetorical appealsFor the reason that Brownback is not as popular as Hillary , he begins his words expecting an emotional answer from the earshot (that is , all people on the cyberspace where the run-in is published , and curiously those who heard his barbarism at the time it was given ) by discussing the death of author professorship Ronald Reagan . aft(prenominal) this , the Senator is prepared to precede his subject , i .e . why abortion is bad by referring the answer to Reagan , the honorable former professorship of America and his arrangement of abortion . The author homogeneously mentions 9 /11 , fuck off Theresa , and Thomas Jefferson . His concentration on the use of pathos is clear , although the Senator is wise to add the strong emotional appeals to logical appeals posterior on . The fact that Brownback is a real Senator , no distrust , grants him full points on ethosAs far as Hillary s speech is relate , it is clear that she is reliant on ethos to win support in favor of her argument - that , so it is best to counter the disoblige of abortion through bring out contraception Running for president , Clinton is confident that her husband s former ex-president status does not exact her to make too many a(prenominal) emotional appeals .

Rather , she finds it mere(a) to start off with logos beforehand she introduces pathos later on down the text . still though Clinton is receiving an award at the time she is making the speech in front of women whole - she does not address her audience (including the audience on the Internet , where the speech has been published ) with very(prenominal) many emotional appeals . sooner , she uses her persona most efficaciously , and more abundantly than does Brownback . thereof , both politicians present their similar argument in a different manner , essentially depending upon the audience s acquaintanceship /familiarity with individually speakerReferencesBrownback , Sam (2007 . Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation Revisitedhttp /www .orthodoxytoday .org /articles5 /BrownbackAbortion .phpClinton , Hillary (2006 , June 13 . Women s Right s http /www .hillaryclinton .com /news /speech /view ?id 1235PAGEPAGE 3...If you necessity to get a full essay, pose it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay